is-ought proble fukuyaa ought to be right, even though he isn’t”（你得区别‘应然’和‘实然’。福山理应是对的，即便他实际上是错的。注：这是休谟的“应然实然”的区分，现实存在的未必就是应该存在的，反之亦然。）

sterlg呵呵一笑，“‘ought to be right’? oh baby, he’s jt p wrong”（‘理应是对的？’ 哦我的宝贝儿啊，福山错的离谱。）他敲了敲书封，抬眸微狭，钢灰的视线落向窗外，“huan ciety has always operated on petition and nest the ws of the jungle reign supre ideologies can’t be cssified to right or wrong and ‘the end of history’ is nothg ore than ‘the victor writes history’”（人类社会从来都是靠竞争与征服运转的。丛林法则才是永恒不变的真理。意识形态并不存在所谓的‘对’与‘错’。而‘历史的终结’（即冷战的结束）——不过是‘胜利者书写历史’罢了。）

“you’re aga nfg the is-ought proble jt becae thg is the way it is, doesn’t an it ought to rea ”（你又在混淆‘应然’和‘实然’了。现实如何，并不代表它理应如此。）她语调很冷淡，“besides, without the protection of life, liberty, and property guaranteed by the rule of w liberal deocracies, your capitalist arket would be nonexistent you, least of all people, have any right to estion liberalis”（何况，没有自由民主制度下法治（即，任何人都不可凌驾于法律、宪法之上）对生命、财产、自由的保障，你那资本市场根本不可能存在。 你是最没资格质疑自由主义的人。）

sterlg一挑眉，低笑出声，“you still believe that, after this weekend?”（这周末之后，你还相信这些？）女孩儿恶狠狠乜斜他一眼，他更忍俊不禁，笑叹道：“oh honey, as you said on friday, structures of power exist everywhere with or without capital the ciety we are , arket enoy akes it look like everyone stands a chance, but the syste is rigd agast the vast ajority—return on capital, for exaple, benefited by the legal syste, has far outpaced the return on bor the ciety you’re fro, one doesn’t even need capital to atta power besides, how would you even beg eveng the pyg field, h? people are born with different levels of capabilities, tellince, drive…those who sueed—such as yourself—sueed for good rean”（哎，宝贝儿，你自己周五才说过，权力体系无处不在，无论是否有资本介入。我们所在的这个社会里，自由市场让所有人看似拥有公平竞争的机会，但系统早已对大多数人不公平——比如，法律对资本的保护，使资本回报率远远高于劳动所得的回报率。而在你出生的那个社会里，一个人无需资本也能手握重权。况且，你